THE MESSENGER: The Story of Joan of Arc
By Alex Ness
June 16, 2026
I might begin doing single subject posts here, until I can organize my thoughts better. I have been writing online, reviewing products, retailers, franchises, restaurants and brands since 2000. I was first writing for a yahoo review collective, and it featured anything someone might in fact buy, experience, think about buying. The point of saying this, is that I am not going to just cut the cord and say F that.
However, as much as I might want to keep the works in mind if not in body, my own mind isn't a place I can hide or stow away things. I blurt outside what I meant to keep inside. Some have said I have diarrhea of the mouth. Others say I write the same way without actually saying anything. Perhaps that is true. I wouldn't be the one who could say in a objective fashion if so.
I chose the movie of this entry for a reason I wasn't altogether expecting. During time when I otherwise would be writing for my own purposes, I did a great deal of research regarding questions that I decided didn't matter anyway. (A famous director did a substantially different movie than the book of a famous author that he was said to be adapting.) It has many MANY different entries in the collection of views different than some might even understand exist. Just like my personal outlook on all of the differences between non denominational Protestants, Catholics, with some views, it is matter of what appeals the most, and the divide isn't between moral differences, but in the end, simply just difference. As I might be able to filter the different views, some day, if not today, I am not going to get specific.
The movie I am discussing, is THE MESSENGER: The Story of Joan of Arc. Critics thought for a movie about religious visions and guidance, it was hardly religious, more an action movie wearing religious trappings. Because the Joan of Arc of history had visions, there was also a different issue. Was the real Joan suffering schizophrenic phases or bi-polarity. Was the action portion of the movie really made possible by her mental illness?
This movie allowed the mental issues that moved her to act. It showed her battlefield active leadership. It showed how a vision can lead someone, whatever the source. The acting is tremendous, and it is a film that doesn't ignore the events that happened, and didn't falsely portray how the English and the French of the Dauphin later King of France failed to understand what she was. She was more than a leader on the field, she was a moment of powerful emotion given a voice. She was a woman in a mostly male oriented role. She was not sexualized by the film makers, but she was almost certainly raped. But the Dauphin failed Joan, and feared she might become more popular than the Dauphin. The English were of a mind that she must be possessed. But burning her without her recanting her account of having visions, led to Joan becoming a Martyr and a symbol of resistance.
In an century where war and adventure films focus upon nudity and violence, this movie had heart in all of its presentation. Perhaps it felt like propaganda to the critics, a movie that seemed to them exaggerated to create a greater impact. But it was subtle in ways, it was well acted and the cinematography was great. I suspect it was simply the path it followed, being aimed at how she was able to move men to fight and win victories, for more than the future king, or for Joan, but for a higher calling. Something often distrusted in the present.
Thanks for being hereMY POETRY AlexNessPoetry.Blogspot.Com
HERE: Poplitiko.Blogspot.Com
MY PUBLISHED WORKS
Social Media
https://bsky.app/profile/alexanderness63.bsky.social
https://x.com/alexnesspoetry









































